Just to be on the clear, I have not tested this site on internet exlplorer 6 (IE6) and do not intend to do so. It renders ok on Firefox, Chrome, and IE7.
This is my way of giving a vote of no confidence to IE6, a mistake of a browser that was replaced many years ago. Since part of my job includes web design, I always have to spend a frustrating amount of time fixing IE6 bugs for my client’s websites.
I’m glad to not have to do that on my personal blog.
So dear reader if this page looks like acid has been poured on it, chances are you are using an outdated browser. You are strongly advised to update or replace your web browser.
In short, I just don’t give a hoot about outdated browsers here.
Micheal Moore’s next movie looks at Wall Street and what he dubs the “biggest swindle in American history.” He’s called on people from banking, brokerage and insurance industries to come forward to talk about their experiences and what went on as the crisis unfolded.
“Based on those who have already contacted me, I believe there are a
number of you who know ‘the real deal’ about the abuses that have been
happening. You have information that the American people need to hear,” he
writes on his website. He’s promising them confidentiality. You can bet the portrayal will not be
flattering. The real issue is, how balanced will he be?
Read all about it in this New York Times article.
A couple of years back I came accross a blog article that listed acouple of Sout African web-startups to watch.
As you can imagine, the article generated a lot of comments. Some good, some nasty, and some just plain spaced out. One particular comment caught my attention and has been troubling me ever since.
The fellow wrote something to this effect: “I notice that most of these hotshot startups you mention have based their systems on web application frameworks like Joomla! and Drupal. Where are the real programmers, who would use something like Perl or Python to build their web applications from the ground up?”
For a long time I could not decide which was the best route to take. After all application frameworks each have their own niggles and idiosyncrasies and you rarely find the perfect extension to fully address your business challenge. On the other hand, coding from scratch can be a very expensive excercise (sure, you don’t have worry about those pesky GNU/GPL licensing rules afterwards, but you will have paid though the nose for that priviledge).
There is also the issue of addressing security vulnerabilities as they occur with your custom applications. Just ask Microsoft how challenging that task can be! You don’t have to look far to grasp the magnitude of work involved in addressing exploits. If you are sitting at a Windows machine or a Mac, just think back to how many software updates you have had to install from these manufactures. Oh! The Megabytes!
We can argue that with Open source application frameworks the security exploit vulnerabilities are minimised. There’s a whole army of people from all walks of life behind these frameworks who address security exploits quickly. Imagine how much time, money and effort it would cost a one-man show or one company to keep hackers at bay.
For the real programmers, I agree that if you want something done right you better do it yourself because now off-the shelf generalised package will ever fit your unique needs 100%.
Personally, I use both approaches when appropriate and I don’t think this is a matter of choosing one strategy over another. They both have their merrits and flaws. I think this is a matter of choosing the right tool for the job at hand.
What do you think?